After the September 2015 issue of The Atlantic was released, many people had mixed emotions towards one specific piece:, “The Coddling of the American Mind,”. The in which the authors, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, of “The Coddling of the American Mind” arguesargued that a new found sensitivity among college students hashad generated censorship among professors and their course'scourse content. They provideprovided various accounts of students letting their emotions control their train of thought and definedefined helpful cognitive distortions. As a distinguished social psychologist. Jonathan, Haidt also discussesdiscussed a psychological solution to this sensitivity. Lukianoff and Haidt effectively buildbuilt their argument through the use of anecdotes, diction, and ethos in order to persuade the college community to acquire a solution before they lose sight of challenging and preparing their students.
Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt clarifyclarified how students havehad let their emotional responses control colleges through the use of specific anecdotes. They provideprovided anecdotes that effectively displaydisplayed how colleges havehad become much more sensitive and diplomatic. They recalled, “Rice was the first black female secretary of state; Lagarde was the first woman to become finance minister of a G8 country and the first female head of the IMF. Both speakers could have been seen as highly successful role models for female students, and Rice for minority students as well. But the critics, in effect, discounted any possibility of something positive coming from those speeches” (par. 55 ). This anecdote verifiesverified how colleges have obscured diverse perspectives in fear of making their students feel uncomfortable. The author exposesauthors exposed how delicate college students havehad become by allowing their emotions to guide their thoughts, rather than logic.