Julius Caesar’s loss of life wasn’t justified because of the very fact there was little evidence supporting his ambitious nature. Brutus thinks that assassinating Caesar will, in the end, stop him from disbanding the Republic and becoming Rome's emperor. Afterward, he became Rome’s emperor. Caesar also wishes to rule as a monarch, but not certain on becoming a tyrant. His assassination only results in the ascension of Octavius.

People like Brutus believed that if Caesar was dead, the Republic would be restored and that they would proceed to experience their privileged status. The Senatorssenators, like Brutus, honestly believed that if Caesar was dead, the Republic would be restored and that they would still enjoy their privileged status. The straightforward reality was that Rome was by then nothing over a military state surpass the strongest general. The veneer of a lawful republic in Rome was very thinly disguised. itIt has been only a matter of your time before the strongest general will rule the full thingall, without hiding behind Consulshipconsulship and propriety.

Finally, Caesar was the sole oneperson that actually had an opportunity to revive the Republicrepublic. He saw the problems within the Republicrepublic and saw that the solution was to incorporate the populace. Now one may argue that he did so only in order that he himself gainsto gain power from it, ... maybe. there'sThere's no thankspurpose to argue this time, as we can’t know what he really thought. I'm on athe side that claims that while Caesar loved his honors, he actually never wanted to be a Kingking. He wanted to be referred to as the founding father of Rome, and stabilize the govt.government.
We can’t know what would have happened if Caesar wasn’tweren't assassinated, but we can say without a shadow of a doubt that his death was not justifiable by moral, legal, or even simple pragmatic reasoning.